Regarding the prize pool size, I'm assuming that the goal is to grow the adoption of Stellar as a platform. So what's the rationale behind keeping the prize pool constant? The same number of lumens 3 months ago can now buy you 10X as many developers. Isn't that a good thing? Why artificially lower it by 10X to cap growth? The cost is little, and you may not get this good of an opportunity in 3 more months, once Asian countries start banning exchanges. I think it should be obvious that with a bigger prize pool, you'll get more participants and higher quality projects.