Comparing Stellar Wallets

dzham

Some of the stargazer info is wrong.

I support testnet, and assets can definitely be created. If multi is multi-sig accounts, stargazer was probably the first wallet that had that.

For more ideas about data points to check, my oooold sheet is here, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lmDA2AO1qxvdWdVqi1OAtxCVJDBqlMWOh4ZQDnRbq88/edit#gid=0

Umbrel has one too, can't seem to find it ATM.

tim

dzham Hi, thanks for your correction and your sheet. I updated my sheet.

umbrel

dzham Umbrel has one too, can't seem to find it ATM.

mine is here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DhjXMqKadHGjAV_hpMWS-ylIhv3l-zVNFjqmpeu2gGA/edit?usp=sharing
it's outdated by now.

tim It also would be interesting to know how many active users are on each wallet? Any ideas to get that information?

define active users. 30 days active? non-zero balance or what? For most wallets you can't get that info. For PapayaBot I can share that.

dzham

Torkus

Did you continue developing Galactica?

Torkus

dzham In the back burner at the moment, all my time is invested in the trading bot and the social platform. What would you like to see implemented? Right now I am a little hesitant about developing anymore for Apple since they won't allow crypto apps on the app store so I'm considering a more universal approach perhaps using Electron or the soon-to-take-the-world-by-storm Flutter.

tim

Torkus thanks, I will add them

Torkus

tim Hey here is a more complete description of both wallets:

Galactica:

Type: macOS
Account send/receive/multi: send/receive/multi
Account Config inflation, home, flags: yes
Assets accept/remove/create: accept/remove
Address Book: no
Exchange Trade: no
Transaction History: yes
Network: publi/test
Special Comment: secret stored on keychain, read only accounts

Mooney:

Type: Web Extension
Account send/receive/multi: send/receive
Account Config inflation, home, flags: inflation
Assets accept/remove/create: accept/remove
Address Book: no
Exchange Trade: yes
Transaction History: yes
Network: public
Special Comment: analog to Metamask, implements SEP-007 web+stellar

tim

Torkus Hi torkus, thanks, I updated your input on my sheet.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14hs18NkgKerF47YPI0NQDX0gN2ZAN98Z0LValHGYrZ8/edit#gid=987160927

tim

It also would be interesting to know how many active users are on each wallet? Any ideas to get that information?

tim

umbrel ok, thanks, interesting to see.

Regarding active users, I would say non-zero balance accounts. If you provide PapayaBot numbers, do you mind if I display that in the sheet?

dzham

umbrel it's outdated by now.

Just as mine is, but you might have some interesting data points you measure.

fritz

Some updates:

Interstellar supports Web, Desktop and Android
Interstellar supports both public and testnet networks (https://testnet.interstellar.exchange)

Special comment/Feature
- Interstellar supports price conversion into major fiat currencies for XLM or any other stellar token.)
- Interstellar automatically funds unactivated wallets with BTC, LTC, XRP or ETH deposits.

Multi??
Does multi refer to multisig or support for multiple wallets? Anyway, Interstellar supports both multisig and multiple wallets in the same session. (Stargazer too supports multiple wallets and multisig)

tim

blockeq thanks, I included blockeq with your data
fritz thanks also for your update

blockeq

BlockEQ:

Type: Desktop (Mac, Windows, Linux) & Mobile (iOS, and Android coming soon)
Account send/receive/multi: send/receive
Account Config inflation, home, flags: inflation
Assets accept/remove/create: accept/remove
Address Book: no
Exchange Trade: yes
Transaction History: yes
Network: public
Special Comment: includes trade history, create and cancel trade offers

We will be publishing the updated Beta versions of our desktop and mobile wallets next week!

Will

tim Awesome list, thanks for the effort!

umbrel

tim sure, otherwise I wouldn't provide that info.
it's around 1000 users as of now.

petrosan

So which wallet is the most reliable?

tim

petrosan define reliable? My recommendation is to check which features you need and then check the wallets regarding the usability.
@umbrel, @dzham thanks, I updated the file with your usernumbers

petrosan

tim Thank you, I've already chosen Scopuly

antb123

I like umbrel's list. I would add

Other features:
deposit/withdrawal support
encrypted private key

I have a REPL based command line wallet I will release once I have deposit and withdrawal working.

Thanks